THE INFLUENCE OF AUDITORY GANZFELD CHARACTERISTICS UPON FREE-RESPONSE ESP PERFORMANCESTANFORD RG.1979; J. AMER. SOC. PSYCH. RES.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 73; NO 3; PP. 253-272; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

COMMUNICATION AMONG PRIMATES = COMMUNICATION PARMI LES PRIMATESPETERS M; PLOOG D.1973; ANN. REV. PHYSIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 35; PP. 221-242; BIBL. 6 P. 1/2Serial Issue

UNTERSUCHUNGEN ZUR TAKTILEN, AUDITIVEN UND VISUELLEN SUGGESTIBILITAT = ETUDES DE LA SUGGESTIBILITE TACTILE, AUDITIVE ET VISUELLEGHEORGHIU VA; HODAPP V; THIEDIG S et al.1972; ARCH. PSYCHOL.; DTSCH.; DA. 1972; VOL. 124; NO 4; PP. 303-320; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 12REF.Article

DETECTION AND DISCRIMINATION OF MOVING GRATINGSTHOMPSON P.1981; ACT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1-3; PP. 5-13; BIBL. 14 REF.Conference Paper

PHONETIC FEATURES AND ACOUSTIC INVARIANCE IN SPEECHBLUMSTEIN SE; STEVENS KN.1981; COGNITION; ISSN 0010-0277; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 10; NO 1-3; PP. 25-32; BIBL. 2 P.Article

INFORMATION IN SPEECH: OBSERVATIONS ON THE PERCEPTION OF (S)-STOP CLUSTERSBAILEY PJ; SUMMERFIELD Q.1980; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERFECT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 536-563; BIBL. 1 P.Article

TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL FACTORS IN GAIT PERCEPTION THAT INFLUENCE GENDER RECOGNITION.BARCLAY CD; CUTTING JE; KOZLOWSKI LT et al.1978; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 145-152; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

DISCRIMINATION OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL INTERVALS DEFINED BY THREE LIGHT FLASHES: EFFECTS OF SPACING ON TEMPORAL JUDGMENTS AND OF TIMING ON SPATIAL JUDGMENTS.COLLYER CE.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 21; NO 4; PP. 357-364; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF VOWEL SIMILARITY AND SYLLABLE LENGTH ON ACOUSTIC MEMORY.HALL LL; BLUMSTEIN SE.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 95-99; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ARE VISUALLY PRESENTED ONE-SYLLABLE WORDS INTEGRAL STIMULI.SILVERMAN WP.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 9; NO 2; PP. 103-105; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE CASE AGAINST A SPEECH MODE OF PERCEPTIONSCHOUTEN MEH.1980; ACTA PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 44; NO 1; PP. 71-98; BIBL. 4 P.Article

LA STRUCTURE DE PROCESSUS DE REVERBERATION DU TEMPS DANS LE SYSTEME VISUELKRUMINYA SK.1979; FIZIOL. CHELOVEKA; SUN; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 5; PP. 869-874; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

DIFFERENCES IN TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION BETWEEN ABSTRACT AND CONCRETE WORDS AS A FUNCTION OF VISUAL HALF-FIELD AND FREQUENCY.HINES D.1977; CORTEX; ITALY; DA. 1977; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 66-73; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

ORDER EFFECT OF ACOUSTIC SEGMENTS OF VC AND CV SYLLABLES ON STOP AND VOIVEL IDENTIFICATION.OHDE RN; SHARF DJ.1977; J. SPEECH HEARG RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 543-554; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

RECOGNITION AND CONFUSION OF THE LOWERCASE ALPHABET.GEYER LH.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 6; PP. 487-490; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

VOICE ONSET TIME AND FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY AS CUES TO THE /ZI/SI/DISTINCTION.MASSARO DW; COHEN MM.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 373-382; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

TIME, OUR LOST DIMENSION: TOWARD A NEW THEORY OF PERCEPTION, ATTENTION, AND MEMORY.JONES MR.1976; PSYCHOL. REV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 83; NO 5; PP. 323-355; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE INTERFACE BETWEEN PSI AND SUBLIMINAL PERCEPTIONRONEY DOUGAL S.1981; PARAPSYCHOL. REV.; ISSN 0031-1804; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 12-18; BIBL. 1 P.Article

THE PERCEPTUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SPEECHJUSCZYK PW; SMITH LB; MURPHY C et al.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 1; PP. 10-23; BIBL. 32 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF SYMMETRY IN THE GOOD CONTINUATION RATINGS OF TWO-PART TONAL MELODIESBALCH WR.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 55; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

MULTIDIMENSIONAL LETTER SIMILARITY DERIVED FROM RECOGNITION ERRORSGILMORE BC; HERSH H; CARAMAZZA A et al.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 25; NO 5; PP. 425-431; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

TIME ESTIMATION AND REPRODUCTION UNDER CONDITIONS OF DIFFERENTIAL PERCEPTUAL OSCILLATION.LECHELT EC.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 42; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1235-1241; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

FOVEAL DIPLOPIA THRESHOLD AND FIXATION DISPARITIESDUWAER AL; VAN DEN BRINK G.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 321-329; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

HOW THE COMPONENTS OF SPEAKING RATE INFLUENCE PERCEPTION OF PHONETIC SEGMENTSMILLER JL; GROSJEAN F.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 208-215; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

DIMENSION ANALYSIS OF PERCEIVED SOUND QUALITY OF SOUND-REPRODUCING SYSTEMSGABRIELSSON A.1979; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWE; DA. 1979; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 159-169; BIBL. 27 REF.Article